73
What Was Visa Reason Code 73, Expired Card?
The old code 73 covered sales on expired cards with no authorization. Here is what it meant and how merchants answered it.
- Network
- Old Visa codes
- Published
Visa reason code 73 was the old code for an Expired Card chargeback. It belonged to the group of codes that covered authorization problems. A merchant who got one had taken an expired card. The merchant had also skipped authorization on the sale.
What Was Visa Reason Code 73?
In the older Visa rules, reason code 73 was called Expired Card. It was one of the legacy reason codes merchants saw on a chargeback notice.
The claim behind it was simple. The card was past its expiration date on the day of the sale. The merchant did not get an approval for it. No authorization was requested. So the merchant could not show the network had checked the card and found it valid.
When did reason code 73 apply?
Reason code 73 applied when a merchant took a card that had already expired and did not get authorization. Both parts had to be true.
If the card was expired but the merchant got an approval, that approval covered the sale. The code did not fit. If the card was still valid but the merchant skipped authorization, another code covered that error.
This code showed up most often with sales where the card was not present and the merchant keyed in the details by hand.
How the expiration date was handled for card-not-present sales
For phone, mail and online orders, the expiration date the cardholder gave was assumed to be correct. The merchant could not see the card. So the rules did not ask the merchant to check the date against anything.
That assumption cut both ways. It protected a merchant who wrote down the date the buyer read out. But it also meant that if the buyer gave a date that had already passed, the merchant was the one holding a bad sale.
The safe habit was to ask for authorization every time, even on a keyed sale. An approval meant the network had checked the card. For more on how these sales are treated now, see card not present disputes.
How merchants could fight a reason code 73 chargeback
A merchant could fight it with its authorization log or proof the card had not expired on the sale date. Those were the two paths.
The first path was the authorization log. If the merchant asked for and got an approval, that record proved the chargeback was filed under the wrong code.
The second path was proof about the date. If the merchant could show the card was still valid when the sale happened, the claim behind the code fell apart.
Proof had to answer the code. A delivery record or signed receipt would not help here. The claim was about the card's date, not the goods. If you are new to these notices, start with how to read a chargeback notice.
The move from legacy reason codes to the new dispute categories
Reason code 73 is not in use today. As part of the VCR Initiative, Visa consolidated its 22 legacy reason codes into four dispute categories. The old numbered codes, 73 among them, were folded into the new system.
A chargeback notice you get now will not carry the number 73. It will name one of the four categories instead. Visa now sorts disputes into four categories: 10 Fraud, 11 Authorization, 12 Processing Errors and 13 Consumer Disputes. An authorization claim goes in the 11 group.
The old codes still matter for one thing. If you are reading an old case file or an archived notice, the number 73 tells you what the claim was. A notice you get today will not use this code. The current rules cover claims about missing authorization. American Express has its own codes for similar claims. See no valid authorization and authorization approval expired.
If you answer a chargeback and the issuer pushes back, the case moves to a later round. Read what happens after you answer a chargeback to know what each network does next.